<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Automobile Branding &#8211; changing times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://communications.webalue.com/2009/10/28/automobile-branding-changing-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://communications.webalue.com/2009/10/28/automobile-branding-changing-times/</link>
	<description>.... your Brand Management Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Roach</title>
		<link>http://communications.webalue.com/2009/10/28/automobile-branding-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Roach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communications.webalue.com/?p=527#comment-848</guid>
		<description>That was a good article Lata, thanks. While for the most part I&#039;d agree. Sure we all want value but if that were our sole concern we&#039;d all be driving little boring vehicles that got us for A to B. Our passion for things that represent our self-image continues to define us. Myself I am a Honda and Macintosh person. These are two brands that I identify with. While I might be swayed to another vehicle (the Soltice for instance) essentially I look to Honda first. But I only buy Mac and have since it&#039;s launch in &#039;84. 

I thought the article interesting that the author suggests the move from loyalty started in the eighties, I think it was more like the mid-seventies. Detroit built vehicles that were manufactured to disintegrate so the public would replace them sooner. This lack of quality stuck and we all know that even 30 years later they are dogged with a brand image of quality problems where none exist. The perception of poor quality became their reality. 

In your part of the world, what is the perception of the Big 3? Can their cars be purchased where you live? What car do you identify with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a good article Lata, thanks. While for the most part I&#8217;d agree. Sure we all want value but if that were our sole concern we&#8217;d all be driving little boring vehicles that got us for A to B. Our passion for things that represent our self-image continues to define us. Myself I am a Honda and Macintosh person. These are two brands that I identify with. While I might be swayed to another vehicle (the Soltice for instance) essentially I look to Honda first. But I only buy Mac and have since it&#8217;s launch in &#8217;84. </p>
<p>I thought the article interesting that the author suggests the move from loyalty started in the eighties, I think it was more like the mid-seventies. Detroit built vehicles that were manufactured to disintegrate so the public would replace them sooner. This lack of quality stuck and we all know that even 30 years later they are dogged with a brand image of quality problems where none exist. The perception of poor quality became their reality. </p>
<p>In your part of the world, what is the perception of the Big 3? Can their cars be purchased where you live? What car do you identify with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lata Vijaybaskar</title>
		<link>http://communications.webalue.com/2009/10/28/automobile-branding-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>Lata Vijaybaskar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communications.webalue.com/?p=527#comment-834</guid>
		<description>Ed, NY Times had written an article on Oct 20th on the topic basically referring to North America. Pl chk: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/21/business/21auto.html?_r=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, NY Times had written an article on Oct 20th on the topic basically referring to North America. Pl chk: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/21/business/21auto.html?_r=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/21/business/21auto.html?_r=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meheer Thakare</title>
		<link>http://communications.webalue.com/2009/10/28/automobile-branding-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Meheer Thakare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communications.webalue.com/?p=527#comment-832</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, we should refer to it as a &#039;long tail&#039; while syaing &#039;Customers no longer buy of Nostalgia&#039;. While the statement may not be entirely true, we must point out that not every well-performing car manufacturer today has the Shelby or Beetle Advantage. The Vintage nostalgia is at a different level altogether. Some of the rising names in Automobiles like Hyundai, Kia, Mitsubishi, Suzuki which arguably account for most sales in the entire Asian region (Being asian ofcourse), run their organizations on values other than nostalgia (somethink like lost-cost high-features startegy works wonders for them). Toyota has long been seen trying promote the legendary status of its &#039;Corolla&#039; brand, but people (atleast in our part of the planet) only buy the car based on its offerings compared to the competition..

I think I get your point Ed and agree with you too, with only one exception that most car manufacturers today are pushing their modernized image rather than promoting their century of experience in creating world class legendary cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, we should refer to it as a &#8216;long tail&#8217; while syaing &#8216;Customers no longer buy of Nostalgia&#8217;. While the statement may not be entirely true, we must point out that not every well-performing car manufacturer today has the Shelby or Beetle Advantage. The Vintage nostalgia is at a different level altogether. Some of the rising names in Automobiles like Hyundai, Kia, Mitsubishi, Suzuki which arguably account for most sales in the entire Asian region (Being asian ofcourse), run their organizations on values other than nostalgia (somethink like lost-cost high-features startegy works wonders for them). Toyota has long been seen trying promote the legendary status of its &#8216;Corolla&#8217; brand, but people (atleast in our part of the planet) only buy the car based on its offerings compared to the competition..</p>
<p>I think I get your point Ed and agree with you too, with only one exception that most car manufacturers today are pushing their modernized image rather than promoting their century of experience in creating world class legendary cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Roach</title>
		<link>http://communications.webalue.com/2009/10/28/automobile-branding-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Roach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communications.webalue.com/?p=527#comment-830</guid>
		<description>Lata, I think you are incorrect when you state that the public no longer buy cars for nostalgia. The new Chevy Camaro is absolutely based on the muscle car of the sixties and is so popular that there are waiting lists to buy. People are willing to pay a premium to get one sooner. The Mustang and Charger are also harbingers of a bygone era and are both selling very well. As is the Beetle and Mini. 

Emotion sells cars. Playing on nostalgia has buyers digging deep. Obvious to readers, I am stating predominantly North American cars, so maybe there isn&#039;t the same lust for nostalgia in your corner of the planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lata, I think you are incorrect when you state that the public no longer buy cars for nostalgia. The new Chevy Camaro is absolutely based on the muscle car of the sixties and is so popular that there are waiting lists to buy. People are willing to pay a premium to get one sooner. The Mustang and Charger are also harbingers of a bygone era and are both selling very well. As is the Beetle and Mini. </p>
<p>Emotion sells cars. Playing on nostalgia has buyers digging deep. Obvious to readers, I am stating predominantly North American cars, so maybe there isn&#8217;t the same lust for nostalgia in your corner of the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meheer Thakare</title>
		<link>http://communications.webalue.com/2009/10/28/automobile-branding-changing-times/comment-page-1/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Meheer Thakare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://communications.webalue.com/?p=527#comment-826</guid>
		<description>You are right Lata. Henry Ford while launching the Model T quoted, &#039;You can have any colour of the Model T as long as it is Black!!&#039; The market dynamics then were pretty different than what they are today and the compelling factor for Model T success was the low-cost strategy.

If Henry Ford&#039;s statement was to be released today for any of the latest Ford cars, only his ghost could save the company from the rising losses. Its all about Consumer value. Companies for long have been wooing consumers with petty features in the cars, but that differentiation coupled with low-cost strategy is fast saturating. 

I reckon, in view of such circumstances, Fiat Mio&#039;s Crowdsourcing strategy will be widely welcomed and adopted by the Big 3&#039;s of Automobiles in the United States in the upcoming future. They&#039;ll surely be able to filter out the maximum value generation ideas of their Crowdsourcing ventures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right Lata. Henry Ford while launching the Model T quoted, &#8216;You can have any colour of the Model T as long as it is Black!!&#8217; The market dynamics then were pretty different than what they are today and the compelling factor for Model T success was the low-cost strategy.</p>
<p>If Henry Ford&#8217;s statement was to be released today for any of the latest Ford cars, only his ghost could save the company from the rising losses. Its all about Consumer value. Companies for long have been wooing consumers with petty features in the cars, but that differentiation coupled with low-cost strategy is fast saturating. </p>
<p>I reckon, in view of such circumstances, Fiat Mio&#8217;s Crowdsourcing strategy will be widely welcomed and adopted by the Big 3&#8242;s of Automobiles in the United States in the upcoming future. They&#8217;ll surely be able to filter out the maximum value generation ideas of their Crowdsourcing ventures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

